The elephant in the room: How to restore Europe’s nature

Content-Type:

News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.

Subscribe to Euractiv's Green Brief, where you’ll find the latest roundup of news covering energy & environment from across Europe.

Welcome to EURACTIV’s Green Brief, our weekly selection of energy and environment news from across Europe. To subscribe, follow this link. You can also subscribe to our daily newsletter here and to our comprehensive weekly update here.

Nature restoration and reversing biodiversity loss are essential parts of the European Green Deal, with the EU pledging to protect 30% of land and sea by 2030.

But the question of how to do this is highly contentious.

It is irrefutable that something needs to be done to save Europe’s nature – 81% of habitats are in a bad state and 1,677 European species are threatened with extinction, with human activity – including intensive agriculture, urbanisation and leisure activities, forestry, and pollution – among the key drivers.

But there are an awful lot of toes to step on in reversing the decline. Environment policy is always complex in Brussels due to major differences between ecosystems across Europe. And certain sectors, like forestry and farming, are deeply rooted in national identities.

The European Commission’s plan to revive its ecosystems, the Nature Restoration Law, has managed to step on almost every toe – from farming, fishing and forestry to housing and renewable energy production.

Views on the law range from scepticism to downright opposition, with a few fans standing stalwartly by it. There is a lot of support for nature restoration “in principle” but the elephant – or equivalent European mammal – in the room is how “in principle” becomes “in practice”.

EU climate chief Frans Timmermans warned about this in December, telling EU ministers: “We have to be careful that in principle doesn’t become a way of dismissing the ultimate concrete goals we will have to achieve.”

The proposal is on a knife edge after it was rebuffed by the European Parliament’s agriculture (AGRI) and fisheries (PECH) committees in May. It now risks becoming stuck in the endless eddy of EU legislative procedure if rejected by the environment committee (ENVI) on 15 June.

Already, the driving force opposing the proposal, the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP), looks ready to dig its heels in. The rejection confirms there is a “huge problem” with the Commission’s proposal, Christine Schneider, the group’s lawmaker in charge of negotiating it in the environment committee, told EURACTIV.

“We as EPP worked hard to improve the Commission’s proposal and to find compromises in the leading committee ENVI […] and I am still negotiating. There were hundreds of amendments tabled by EPP, which shows how serious we took this. Nevertheless, it is difficult to build something solid on a foundation that is too fragile,” she said.

Other groups are more positive, with the leading lawmakers from the centrist Renew Europe, the Left and the Greens telling EURACTIV they don’t want to see the proposal rejected.

“Any rejection of the Nature Restoration Law is a direct attack on the rights of European citizens for a toxic-free, liveable nature and the preservation of people’s livelihoods. The survival of species, including our own, must not be traded for short-sighted political campaigning,” said Jutta Paulus from the Greens.

Meanwhile, Renew lawmaker Maria Soraya Rodríguez Ramos said the rejection was worrying but not surprising and that she was confident the proposal would be adopted in the Parliament’s environment committee.

“We have listened and we are aware of the need to improve biodiversity and our ecosystems to ensure food security not only in the long term but also in the short term, which is already seriously threatened by severe droughts, pollinator decline, poor agricultural soil conditions, chemical waste pollution of our waters and aquifers. Therefore, this law responds to and has also taken into account important concerns of the agricultural and fisheries sector,” she said.

EU countries, meanwhile, are working to find a common approach by the meeting of environment ministers on 20 June. They also have issues with the law, including its administrative costs, how to share space with housing and renewables, and how to implement it in places where local authorities have a say, like in city planning.

However, several diplomatic sources told EURACTIV that EU governments are taking a “constructive” approach and are working on resolving the issues with the aim of agreeing on the law in June.

Before then, all eyes will be on the European Parliament’s environment committee to see if it manages to negotiate its way around the issues. But until Europe decides to take real action, its nature will continue to decline and, one day, the elephant may no longer be in the room.

– Kira Taylor


Today’s edition is powered by WeMove Europe

Make Ecocide a Crime. We’re facing an ecological crisis now.  It’s the result of decades of companies massively destroying our planet. What they’ve done is called ECOCIDE – literally killing our home. More than 600,000 people have already asked the EU to make ecocide a crime. Will they listen? Find out more >>


Top stories

Germany gears up for EU fight over electricity bidding zones

Talks on Germany’s future electricity market are heating up as all parties await a key analysis from grid operators amid looming threats from Brussels to split up the country’s wholesale market bidding zone.

Moscow 'hostage' of its own energy games in Moldova, minister says

Moldova’s breakaway region of Transnistria continues to enjoy “de facto free gas” from Russia’s Gazprom – a situation which satisfies no one but ensures political stability in the Russian-controlled region, the country’s energy minister told EURACTIV in an exclusive interview.

France needs to invest €66bn a year on climate action, government report states

France must spend €66 billion every year until 2030 in order to hit its climate targets, a new report by a government advisory body says, suggesting more debt and taxing the rich as a way to foot the bill.


The Capitals – editor’s pick

HELSINKI. Finnish electricity prices drop to historic low twice in a week. Electricity prices in Finland fell into negative territory twice last week, a historic first resulting in consumers having their bills lowered. Read more.

THE HAGUE. Dutch lawmakers call for better protection of North Sea from espionage. Lawmakers from coalition partners VVD (Renew), CDA (EPP) and D66 (Renew) called on the Defence Ministry to take complete responsibility for the protection and surveillance of critical infrastructure in the North Sea. Read more.

SOFIA. EU Commission asks Bulgaria to cut energy subsidies, reduce consumption. The European Commission has asked Bulgaria to suspend the current scheme of state subsidies for the private sector to reduce the budget deficit and implement measures to reduce electricity consumption. Read more.

THE HAGUE. Dutch businesses slam proposed punitive tax on fossil fuels. Business associations, while broadly welcoming the government’s climate package, expressed concern over a proposed energy tax on fossil fuels in a letter to parliament claiming this could lead to a steep rise in costs due to a lack of alternative energy sources. Read more.

BRUSSELS. Belgian Greens slam De Croo for echoing Macron’s climate law break call. Belgium’s Green Party, including  Climate and Environment Minister Zakia Khattabi, criticised Prime Minister Alexander De Croo’s call for a regulatory break on EU climate that echoes French President Emmanuel Macron’s call, also condemned by national Greens. Read more.

VIENNA. Austria has yet to make a clear plan to decouple from Russian gas, Commission says. Austria does not have a clearly defined short-term plan to reduce Russian gas imports, the European Commission said as part of its European Semester review on Wednesday. Read more.


Must reads


News in brief

EU’s waste shipment regulation ready for final talks. The Council of the European Union, representing the bloc’s 27 member states, adopted its negotiating mandate on Wednesday (24 May) to start talks with the European Parliament on a proposal to update EU legislation on cross-border waste shipments.

“We cannot continue to export our waste problems. This regulation will give us better guarantees that the waste we send abroad doesn’t harm health and the environment,” said Romina Pourmokhtari, the Minister for Climate and the Environment of Sweden, which currently holds the EU’s rotating presidency. More detail here. (Frédéric Simon | EURACTIV.com)


Opinions


On our radar

JUNE

  • JUNE. European Parliament plenary vote on EU Nature Restoration Law. 
  • 1 JUNE. Gas package trilogue.
  • 3-11 JUNE. EU Green Week.
  • 6 JUNE. First EPBD trilogue. 
  • 19 JUNE. Energy Council. 
  • 20-22 June 2023. EU Sustainable Energy Week
  • 20 JUNE. Environment Council.
  • 20 JUNE. Commission communication on climate change, environmental degradation, and security and defence
  • 21 JUNE. Greening transport package. 
  • 29-30 JUNE. European Council.
  • 30 JUNE. Deadline for European Member States to update their revised National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs).

JULY

  • 5 JULY. Commission presents Food and biodiversity package, including soil health law and revision of EU waste framework directive (food waste and textile aspects)
  • 11 JULY. Commission presents Greening transport package.

SECOND SEMESTER

  • OCTOBER. European Parliament plenary vote on Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation. 
  • 26-27 OCTOBER. European Council.
  • 30 NOVEMBER-12 DECEMBER. UN Climate Change Conference (COP 28), Dubai. 
  • 14-15 DECEMBER. European Council. 
  • Q4. Revision of REACH regulation.

[Edited by Frédéric Simon and Nathalie Weatherald]

Read more with Euractiv

Subscribe now to our newsletter EU Elections Decoded

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe