Scientist in white lab coat, goggles, and gloves pouring substance into beaker.
Credit: CDC/Unsplash

EPA’s research office faces deep cuts, sparking alarm over environmental protections

The potential elimination of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development could result in mass layoffs of scientists and weaken the agency’s ability to assess and respond to environmental threats.

Aman Azhar reports for Inside Climate News.


In short:

  • Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, former EPA science official, warns that the proposed restructuring could eliminate up to 1,155 scientific positions and shutter key research facilities.
  • The Office of Research and Development plays a critical role in detecting pollutants, assessing toxic risks, and informing regulations with scientific research.
  • Orme-Zavaleta argues that gutting this office would set back scientific progress for decades, leaving emerging threats like PFAS and nanoplastics unchecked.

Key quote:

"It took decades to build it. It will take decades to rebuild it."

— Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, former principal deputy assistant administrator, EPA Office of Research and Development

Why this matters:

The EPA relies on scientific research to set regulations that protect public health and the environment. Proposed budget cuts to its research division could weaken the agency’s ability to detect and respond to environmental hazards, from industrial chemicals to climate-related disasters. Without independent studies, regulations may become more reactive than preventive, potentially exposing communities to unregulated pollutants and slowing responses to crises like chemical spills and harmful algal blooms.

Supporters of the cuts argue that regulatory decisions should lean more on industry-led research or state-level initiatives, while critics warn that weakening federal research could lead to regulatory capture, where industries influence policies in their favor. With climate-related disasters on the rise and concerns over water and air quality persisting, experts caution that reducing the EPA’s scientific capacity could leave the country less prepared to address emerging environmental threats.

Read more: Trump administration moves to dismantle EPA’s science office

About the author(s):

EHN Curators
EHN Curators
Articles curated and summarized by the Environmental Health News' curation team. Some AI-based tools helped produce this text, with human oversight, fact checking and editing.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate